From the various comments it gathered, it seems there are quite a few gay poets in Singapore. Is it because gay poets have the hardware of a man and software of a woman thus having the best of both worlds, or maybe they are able to utilize both sides of their brains more efficiently?
One thing for sure, John Keats wasn’t gay, he was too in love with Fanny Brawne to be gay. I don’t think Shelly was gay either, so were William Wordsworth and Wilfred Owen. But does anyone know if William Shakespeare was gay?
Most non-gay poet dreads to be labeled as gay. Even Alvin Pang in his humorous article which he wrote a few years ago said,
“Mention that you're a poet and your manhood is immediately in question.”
Whether the poet is a gay doesn’t bother me. I am only concern with the quality of his poems. But I do hope they write more on other topics rather than their sexual adventures. Here we have this rare instance where poems choose its readers. Not everybody, especially male readers are comfortable with reading vivid descriptions of a man humping another man. Beside, how should I answer if my twelve years nephew shows me one of Cyril’s poems such as this and asks me to explain what it is about?

Me a gay, didn’t you guys watch the movie “Shakespeare In Love?”
10 comments:
I teach a bit about Shakespeare; I never really thought about it. Hmmm, sounds like a Google search is in order.
Alvin Pang's article is really funny, thanks for it. :)
Yes, I enjoyed that Alvin Pang article too. :)
Hey Fred,
Whoa a Lit teacher! So which is your favourite play? Mine is King Lear.
dsnake1 & gilbert,
Yup, but too bad he doesn't have a blog. Should be very interesting.
(1) You really think I should have a blog?
(2) You really think I don't have one?
(3) Mr Wang is none other than .... someone in this comments section (not me tho)
Hello Alvin,
so nice of you to drop by.
1) Yes, I love your writing.
2) Maybe you do have one but should be a private one right?
3) I know who is Mr Wang. Heehee. :)
actually, I prefer thoughtfully crafted articles to blog-raves. To me it's the difference between a good feature film and reality TV.
Of course I understand if some writers use their blogs really as a convenient archive for their thoughtful articles and writing (eg gilbert)...
But why aren't online published essay/articles treated with the same or more regard as a daily blog (?!?!) Frankly I'm puzzled.
actually, I prefer thoughtfully crafted articles to blog-raves. To me it's the difference between a good feature film and reality TV.
I am absolutely fine with both thoughtfully crafted articles and blog-raves. It all depends on my mood. (I am quite a moody person you know)
Of course I understand if some writers use their blogs really as a convenient archive for their thoughtful articles and writing (eg gilbert)...
For me I use my blog to practice my writing and of course to make new friends. (I know sometimes my articles don’t make sense)
But why aren't online published essay/articles treated with the same or more regard as a daily blog (?!?!) Frankly I'm puzzled.
Hmm… okay I get your point; you do have a blog. :)
Post a Comment